Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Also, it could review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts if the Commission cannot access a decision.

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside the house traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and competently.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it can be unclear the way it relates to any supplied situation, frequently rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances on the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.

Only the written opinions of your Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions of the decrease (trial) courts will not be generally published or distributed.

Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the clear negation from the law laid down from the Supreme Court in its a variety of pronouncements. Read more

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few defeating the ends of justice case law cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.

Typically, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve this sort of differences and, For numerous reasons, these types of appeals are often not granted.

Criminal cases Within the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.